Medical Policy
Subject:  Implantable Infusion Pumps
Policy #: SURG.00068 Current Effective Date: 11/13/2006
Status:    Revised Last Review Date: 09/14/2006

Description/Scope

 

An implantable infusion pump is intended to provide long-term, continuous or intermittent drug infusion. This policy addresses the use of implantable infusion pumps.

 

Policy Statement

 

Medically Necessary:

 

Implantable infusion pumps are considered medically necessary when used to deliver drugs for the treatment of:

  • Primary liver cancer (intrahepatic artery injection of chemotherapeutic agents);
  • Metastatic colorectal cancer where metastases are limited to the liver (intrahepatic artery injection of chemotherapeutic agents);
  • Head/neck cancers (intra-arterial injection of chemotherapeutic agents);
  • Severe, refractory spasticity of cerebral or spinal cord origin in patients who are unresponsive to or cannot tolerate oral baclofen (Lioresal®) therapy (intrathecal injection of baclofen)

Permanently implanted intrathecal (intraspinal) infusion pumps for the administration of opiates or non-opiate analgesics, in the treatment of chronic intractable pain, are considered medically necessary when:

  1. Used for the treatment of malignant (cancerous) pain and all of the following criteria are met:
    1. Strong opioids or other analgesics in adequate doses, with fixed schedule (not PRN) dosing, have failed to relieve pain or intolerable side effects to systemic opioids or other analgesics have developed; and
    2. Life expectancy is greater than three (3) months (less invasive techniques such as external infusion pumps provide comparable pain relief in the short term and are consistent with standard of care); and
    3. Tumor encroachment on the thecal sac has been ruled out by appropriate testing; and
    4. No contraindications to implantation exist such as sepsis or coagulopathy; and
    5. A temporary trial of spinal (epidural or intrathecal) opiates or non-opiate analgesics has been successful prior to permanent implantation as defined by a 50% reduction in pain.

      Note:  A temporary trial of intrathecal (intraspinal) infusion pumps used for the treatment of malignant pain is considered medically necessary only when criteria 1-4 above are met.

  2. Used for the treatment of non-malignant (non-cancerous) pain with a duration of greater than six (6) months and all of the following criteria are met:
    1. Documentation, in the medical record, of the failure of six (6) months of other conservative treatment modalities (pharmacologic, surgical, psychologic or physical), if appropriate and not contraindicated; and
    2. Intractable pain secondary to a disease state with objective documentation of pathology in the medical record; and
    3. Further surgical intervention is not indicated; and
    4. Psychological evaluation has been obtained and evaluation unequivocally states that the pain is not psychologic in origin and that benefit would occur with implantation; and
    5. No contraindications to implantation exist such as sepsis or coagulopathy; and 
    6. A temporary trial of spinal (epidural or intrathecal) opiates or non-opiate analgesics has been successful prior to permanent implantation as defined by a 50% reduction in pain and documentation in the medical record of improved function.

      Note:  A temporary trial of intrathecal (intraspinal) infusion pumps used for the treatment of non-malignant pain is considered medically necessary only when criteria 1-5 above are met.

Note: When an implantable/intrathecal infusion pump is determined to be medically necessary, the supplies necessary for the proper use of the pump are considered medically necessary.

 

Investigational/Not Medically Necessary:

 

Implantable infusion pumps are considered investigational/not medically necessary for the infusion of heparins for thromboembolic disease or antibiotics for osteomyelitis.

 

All other uses of implantable infusion pumps, including fully implantable insulin pumps, are considered investigational/not medically necessary.

 

Rationale

 

The role of opioid therapy in treatment of pain is well established in the medical literature. Individuals who have proven unresponsive to less invasive medical therapy and who require large doses of opioids may be candidates for an implantable delivery system that permits intrathecal administration. This system delivers the opioid directly to the receptors in the spinal cord, allowing smaller doses to be used and thereby minimizing side effects. This position is supported by multiple case control studies.

The use of continuous chemotherapy infusion treatment has been studied for patients with certain types of cancers, including, but not limited to, primary hepatic cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver, and various head and neck cancers. This method of chemotherapy infusion has been found to improve medical outcomes in select individuals where continuous chemotherapy is believed to be appropriate. The evidence supporting this conclusion includes multiple randomized controlled trials. Prospective randomized trials of individuals with unresectable liver disease have shown that compared to conventional systemic therapy, hepatic artery infusion is associated with an increased tumor response rate.


Implantable pumps for delivery of medication to the intrathecal space have been developed as an alternative to chronic systemic administration for the treatment of spasticity of cerebral or spinal origin. These pumps have been demonstrated in numerous randomized controlled trials to reduce adverse effects such as tolerance, dependency, and neurotoxicity.


The use of implantable pumps for infusion of antithrombotic medications for thromboembolic disease, or for the infusion of antibiotics for osteomyelitis, has not been demonstrated to provide any additional improvement in net health outcomes above standard care with bolus or subcutaneous drug administrations. This therapy does not prevent the occurrence of complications or morbidity nor does it significantly relieve pain over other less invasive treatment methods. The risks involved in the implantation and maintenance of implantable infusion pumps for these conditions is not outweighed by any potential benefits. The evidence supporting this conclusion includes multiple case series studies.


Fully implantable insulin pumps are designed to deliver insulin via intraperitoneal or intravenous routes in a programmed and controlled manner to diabetic patients. However, these pumps have been associated with a high incidence of device malfunction related to catheter obstruction, among other malfunctions. Newer devices are under development that are expected to drastically reduce the problem of catheter obstruction. With additional refinements underway, implantable insulin pumps may eventually prove beneficial in the treatment of insulin dependent diabetic patients. To show benefit, however, additional long-term randomized prospective studies are needed.

 

Background/Overview

 

Implantable Infusion Pumps

 

Implantable infusion pump use for the delivery of intrathecal (intraspinal) opiates is based on the existence of opioid (narcotic) receptors on the spinal cord to achieve “selective spinal analgesia” (pain relief). Pumps provide for the long-term delivery of opioid (narcotic) medication in the management of malignant (cancer) pain and nonmalignant (non-cancer) pain. Examples of appropriate nonmalignant pain syndromes which may be treated with implantable pumps include “failed back surgery”, chronic arachnoiditis, visceral pain syndromes, post herpetic neuralgia, phantom limb pain, spinal cord injuries, peripheral neuropathies and reflex sympathetic dystrophy. A successful temporary trial of spinal opiates is required both to evaluate analgesic responsiveness and to increase the long-term success of the procedure. Individuals must be closely monitored as conversion from high dose oral or systemic opioids to spinally administered opioids will sometimes result in withdrawal symptoms.


Treatment with this therapy should remain a last resort, used only after all other appropriate therapies have failed. A permanently implantable drug-infusion system is not usually appropriate when life expectancy is three months or less; for such patients, external drug infusion systems can appropriately provide spinal analgesia and comparable pain relief.


The implantable infusion pump (IIP) is a drug delivery system that provides continuous infusion of an agent at a constant and precise rate. The purpose of an IIP is to deliver therapeutic levels of a drug directly to a target organ or compartment. It is frequently used to deliver chemotherapy directly to the hepatic artery or superior vena cava.


An IIP is surgically placed in a subcutaneous pocket under the infraclavicular fossa or in the abdominal wall and a catheter is threaded into the desired position. A drug is infused over an extended period of time. The drug reservoir may be refilled as needed by an external needle injection through a self-sealing septum in the IIP. Bacteriostatic water or physiological saline is often used to dilute therapeutic drugs. A heparinized saline solution may also be used during an interruption of drug therapy to maintain catheter patency.


There is a range of totally implanted catheters with implanted reservoirs and manual pumps as well as totally implanted catheters with implanted infusion pumps. Implantable infusion pumps are available in either programmable or non-programmable models, depending on the type of medication delivery required. Programmable pumps are for flexible medication delivery as dose titration and regulation will vary due to the dynamic nature of the patient. Programmable designs facilitate flexible dosing options and precise dose titration over time.

An example of a flexible medication delivery pump is the SynchroMed® electronic pump, manufactured by Medtronic Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA). This pump contains a collapsible reservoir that can be filled with 10 to 18ml of liquid medication and a peristaltic pump that pushes the medication through a bacteriostatic filter and catheter into the spinal canal.


Non-programmable pumps are for fixed rate medication delivery when the dosage is expected to be stable. Possible routes of administration include intravenous, intrahepatic, intra-arterial, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, intrathecal, epidural, and intraventricular.


An example of a fixed rate pump is the Infusaid Implantable Infusion Pump, manufactured by Arrow International (Reading, PA, USA). One chamber holds the medication and the other, a charging fluid. Once inserted into the abdomen, the pump regulates to the temperature of the body, leading to the expansion of the charging fluid, which pressurizes the medication chamber to push the drug through the catheter.

 

Fully Implantable Insulin Pumps

 

At the time of this writing, no implantable insulin pumps have received FDA approval for marketing. The MiniMed® 2000 and MiniMed® 2001 implantable insulin pumps have been granted investigational status and are currently being evaluated in clinical trials.

 

Intrathecal Infusion Pumps

 

The intrathecal (IT) catheter is inserted through a needle into the intraspinal space, usually at the lumbar or thoracic level. The other end of the catheter is connected to the pump and then filled with medication. The choice of IT pump depends on the indications for intraspinal therapy, the need for bolus versus continuous infusion, the available support services, cost to the patient, and the patient’s general medical condition, ambulatory status and life expectancy.


External programming is used to set the dosage, rate and timing via telemetry to the pump. The pump needs to be refilled every four to eight weeks by percutaneous injection, depending on flow rate, and trained medical, nursing or technical staff must perform the refilling process.

 

Definitions

 

Bacteriostatic: an agent that inhibits the growth or multiplication of bacteria


Bolus: a dose of a drug given intravenously; specifically a large dose given for the purpose of rapidly achieving the needed therapeutic concentration in the bloodstream


Hepatic colorectal metastases: cancer that has spread from its site of origin to another part of the body


Infraclavicular fossa: a triangular depression bounded by the clavicle and the adjacent borders of the deltoid and pectoralis major muscles


Intrathecal space: the space between the spinal cord and the surrounding membrane (dura mater), which is filled with cerebrospinal fluid

 

Osteomyelitis: a condition characterized by inflammation of bone caused by infection; inflammation may remain localized or may spread through the bone to involve the marrow, cortex, cancellous tissue and periosteum

 

Parenteral: by injection as in subcutaneous, intramuscular, or intravenous


Primary liver cancer: a cancer that originates within liver cells, as opposed to having spread from other organs

 

Coding

 

The following codes for treatments and procedures applicable to this policy are included below for informational purposes. Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis or device code(s) does not constitute or imply member coverage or provider reimbursement policy. Please refer to the member’s contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage of these services as it applies to an individual member.

 

When services may be Medically Necessary:

 

    CPT

36260

Insertion of implantable intra-arterial infusion pump (e.g., for chemotherapy of liver)

36563

Insertion of tunneled centrally inserted central venous access device with subcutaneous pump

61215

Insertion of subcutaneous reservoir, pump or continuous infusion system for connection to ventricular catheter

62350

Implantation, revision or repositioning of tunneled intrathecal or epidural catheter, for long-term medication administration via an external pump or implantable reservoir/infusion pump; without laminectomy

62351

Implantation, revision or repositioning of tunneled intrathecal or epidural catheter, for long-term medication administration via an external pump or implantable reservoir/infusion pump; with laminectomy

62360

Implantation or replacement of device for intrathecal or epidural drug infusion; subcutaneous reservoir

62361

Implantation or replacement of device for intrathecal or epidural drug infusion; non-programmable pump

62362

Implantation or replacement of device for intrathecal or epidural drug infusion; programmable pump, including preparation of pump, with or without programming

 

    HCPCS

E0782

Infusion pump, implantable, non-programmable (includes all components, e.g., pump, catheter, connectors, etc.

E0783

Infusion pump, implantable, programmable (includes all components, e.g., pump, catheter, connectors, etc.

 

    ICD-9 Procedure

86.06

Insertion of totally implantable infusion pump

 

    ICD-9 Diagnosis

 

See policy section for medically necessary indications

 

When services are Investigational/Not Medically Necessary:

For the procedure codes listed above, for the following diagnoses; or when the code describes a procedure indicated in the Policy section as investigational/not medically necessary.

 

    ICD-9 Diagnosis

250.00-250.93

Diabetes mellitus

376.03

Orbital osteomyelitis

444.0-444.9

Arterial embolism and thrombosis

526.4

Inflammatory condition of jaw (e.g., osteomyelitis)

730.00-730.99

Osteomyelitis

 

References

 

Peer Reviewed Publications:

  1. Albright AL, Gilmartin R, Swift D, et al. Long-term intrathecal baclofen therapy for severe spasticity of cerebral origin. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98(2):291-5.
  2. Albright AL. Intrathecal baclofen in cerebral palsy movement disorders. J Child Neurol. 1996; 11(Suppl 1):S29-35.
  3. Anderson V, Burchiel KJ. A prospective study of long-term intrathecal morphine in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain. Neurosurgery. 1999; 44(2):289-300.
  4. Awaad Y, Tayem H, Munoz S, et al. Functional assessment following intrathecal baclofen therapy in children with spastic cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2003; 18(1):26-34.
  5. Bloomgarden ZT. Treatment issues in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(1):230-6.
  6. Carek PJ, Dickerson LM, Sack JL. Diagnosis and management of osteomyelitis. Am Fam Phys. 2001; 63(12):2413-20.
  7. Damascelli B, Patelli G, Frigerio LF, et al. First clinical experience with a high-capacity implantable infusion pump for continuous intravenous chemotherapy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1999; 22(1):37-43.
  8. Gilmer-Hill HS. Boggan JE, Smith KA, Wagner FC Jr. Intrathecal morphine delivered via subcutaneous pump for intractable cancer pain: a review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 1999; 51(1):12-15.
  9. Gooch JL, Oberg WA, Grams B, et al. Care provider assessment of intrathecal baclofen in children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004; 46(8):548-52.
  10. Hartkamp A, Van Boxtel AD, Zonnenberg BA, Witteveen PO. Totally implantable venous access devices: evaluation of complications and a prospective comparative study of two different port systems. Neth J Med. 2000; 57(6):215-23.
  11. Jeandidier N, Boullu S, Busch-Brafin MS, et al. Comparison of antigenicity of Hoechst 21PH insulin using either implantable intraperitoneal pump or subcutaneous external pump infusion in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(1):84-88.
  12. Kemeny N, Huang Y, Cohen AM, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. NEJM. 1999:341(27):2039-48.
  13. Kessler L, Tritschler S, Bohbot A, et al. Macrophage activation in type 1 diabetic patients with catheter obstruction during peritoneal insulin delivery with an implantable pump. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24(2):302-7.
  14. Krach LE, Kriel RL, Gilmartin RC, et al. Hip status in cerebral palsy after one year of continuous intrathecal baclofen infusion. Pediatr Neurol. 2004; 30(3):163-8.
  15. Metz L. Multiple sclerosis: symptomatic therapies. Semin Neurol. 1998; 18(3):389-95.
  16. Penn RD, Paice JA. Chronic intrathecal morphine for intractable pain. J Neurosurg 1987; 67:182-6.
  17. Pohl M, Rockstroh G, Ruckriem S, et al. Time course of the effect of a bolus dose of intrathecal baclofen on severe cerebral spasticity. J Neurol. 2003; 250(10):1195-1200.
  18. Prager J, Jacobs M. Evaluation of patients for implantable pain modalities: medical and behavioral assessment. Clin J Pain. 2001; 17(3):206-14.
  19. Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, Ishikawa K, et al. Prophylactic hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for the prevention of liver metastasis in patients with colon carcinoma: a randomized control trial. Cancer. 2004:100(3):590-7.
  20. Saudek CD, Duckworth WC, Giobbie-Hurder A, et al. Implantable insulin pumps vs. multiple dose insulin for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial. Dept of Veterans Affairs Implantable Insulin Pump Study Group. JAMA. 1996; 276(16):1322-7.
  21. Skitzki JJ, Chang AE. Hepatic artery chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: technical considerations and review of clinical trials. Surg Oncol. 2002; 11(3):123-35.
  22. Smith TJ, Staats PS, Deer T, et al. Implantable Drug Delivery Systems Study Group. Randomized clinical trial of an implantable drug delivery system compared with comprehensive medical management for refractory cancer pain: impact on pain, drug-related toxicity, and survival. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(19):4040-9.
  23. Taricco M, Adone R, Pagliacci C, Telaro E. Pharmacological interventions for spasticity following spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; (2):CD001131.

Government Agency, Medical Society, and Other Authoritative Publications:

  1. American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Practice guidelines for chronic pain management: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on pain management, chronic pain section. Anesthesiology. 1997; 86(4):995-1004.
  2. Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures; Surgical Implantable Spinal Infusion Devices for Chronic Pain and Spasticity. 2003; pp 1-46.
  3. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. National Coverage Determination for Infusion Pumps. NCD #280.14. Effective December 17, 2004. Available at:    http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/index_list.asp?list_type=ncd. Accessed on March 30, 2006.
  4. Hayes, Inc. Hayes Medical Technology Directory. Insulin pumps, Implantable. Lansdale, PA: Hayes, Inc.; April 2001. Search updated March 7, 2006.
  5. Hayes, Inc. Hayes Medical Technology Directory. Intrathecal Baclofen for Cerebral Palsy. Lansdale, PA: Hayes, Inc.; November 2005.
  6. Hayes, Inc. Hayes Medical Technology Directory. Intrathecal Baclofen for Dystonia. Lansdale, PA: Hayes, Inc.; November 2005.
  7. Hayes, Inc. Hayes Medical Technology Directory. Intrathecal Baclofen for Spasticity of Spinal Origin or due to Multiple Sclerosis. Lansdale, PA: Hayes, Inc.; December 2005.
Index

 

Drug Infusion Pumps
HAI
Hepatic Arterial Infusion
Implantable Infusion Pumps
Intrathecal Baclofen for Spasticity
Venous Access Device, Implantable
 

Policy History

Status

Date

Action

Revised 09/14/2006 Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee (MPTAC) review. Removed place of service and length of stay information. Clarified language for temporary trials of pumps. Published on web 11/10/2006.
Reviewed 06/08/2006 MPTAC review. References updated. Published on web 08/01/2006.
Revised 03/23/2006 MPTAC review. Added “non-opiate analgesics” as medically necessary for use during a temporary trial of an intrathecal infusion pump. Added length of stay information. Published on web 03/31/2006.
11/18/2005 Added reference for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) – National Coverage Determination (NCD).
Revised 07/14/2005

MPTAC review. Revision based on Policy Harmonization: Pre-merger Anthem and Pre-merger WellPoint.  Policy number changed from DME.00026 to SURG.00068.

Revised

04/28/2005

MPTAC review.  Revision based on Policy Harmonization: Pre-merger Anthem and Pre-merger WellPoint.

Pre-Merger Organizations

Last Review Date

Policy Number

Title

WellPoint Health Networks, Inc.

06/24/2004

2.06.20

Hepatic Artery Infusion


Federal and State law, as well as contract language, including definitions and specific contract provisions/exclusions, take precedence over Medical Policy and must be considered first in determining eligibility for coverage. The member's contract benefits in effect on the date that services are rendered must be used. Medical Policy, which addresses medical efficacy, should be considered before utilizing medical opinion in adjudication. Medical technology is constantly evolving, and we reserve the right to review and update Medical Policy periodically.

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission from the health plan.

©CPT Only - American Medical Association